home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.19970929-19971216
/
000349_news@newsmaster….columbia.edu _Tue Dec 9 13:50:40 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
2020-01-01
|
2KB
Return-Path: <news@newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu>
Received: from newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.35.30])
by watsun.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA22835
for <kermit.misc@watsun.cc.columbia.edu>; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 13:50:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA04087
for kermit.misc@watsun; Tue, 9 Dec 1997 13:50:39 -0500 (EST)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Path: news.columbia.edu!panix!howland.erols.net!ix.netcom.com!dkcombs
From: dkcombs@netcom.com (David Combs)
Subject: idea for download-display
Message-ID: <dkcombsEKxqv0.Lw3@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom On-Line Services
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 1997 18:47:24 GMT
Lines: 24
Sender: dkcombs@netcom18.netcom.com
Xref: news.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:8144
As an additional number in the download-display
(the WHILE-downloading display), the number
that comes on the modem-box is the one we
all know best. So, how about a speed-number
in THOSE units also -- PLUS a percentage
of the connected-at speed we are then
running (downloading) at.
Would make it easy to compare current
situation with:
1: what % of the POSSIBLE speed the
communications is running at,
ie whether the communications is
all loaded up and slow, or
(wow!) running at 100%.
2: what % of that the current KERMIT-params
are giving us, for easily-remembered numbers
for comparison with that from OTHER settings
for Kermit.
RSVP?